No, it may merely indicate that you are a lousy chess player. What you believe to be intelligent and what is intelligent are two different things.
An intelligent computer would not be programmed with anything specifically related to chess, it would simply learn the game like any human learns board games.
> He claims that there are no signs that computer processing speed will eventually overtake that of the human brain. I say that computer processing speed is undeniably improving rapidly, and that the number of tasks that computers can do is rapidly increasing. Unless there is a hard limit somewhere the assumption should be that we will be eventually overtaken.
That depends on the kind of tasks. Bookkeeping, data storage and retrieval, encoding, decoding, these are all things that a computer is exceptionally good at. But they are all at heart still simply ways to manipulate numbers, basic arithmetic if you want.
Composing a piece of music by computer takes a programmer. No computer ever woke up one fine Sunday morning and wrote a symphony because of the way it felt about the light.
They do not create art, they do not create music, they are excellent tools in the hands of artists and composers.