He can't mean the hyperexponential probability distribution, that's something different.
He can't mean the hyperexponential probability distribution, that's something different.
Certainly O(N^2) is not at the top of the food chain -- for example, it is beaten by O(2^N) or O(N!) or O(N^N). All of these could, colloquially, be referred to as "hyper"exponential.
Imagine a hockey stick graph (exponential). Now imagine that hockey stick graphed on a logarithmic scale -- the logarithms more or less cancel out the exponentiation if done right, making the graph appear to be linear even though the data is exponential. Now, imagine data that, even when graphed on a logarithmic scale, still looks like a hockey stick. That is hyperexponential.
And I think I just proved Sam's point -- that it is hard to visualize/grok.
And the grandparent was pointing out -- correctly -- that that description doesn't really apply here. (2^N)^2 = 2^(2N) = still just 'exponential'. Plotted on a log scale it would still be a straight line.
Hyper-exponential is most likely double exponential O(a^b^N). There is an exponential growth of apps on these platforms and another exponential growth of users on these apps.
The value of a network is measured as O(V^2), where V is the number of nodes (users) in the network.
"and also many of these services/products double their userbase every N months."
V = 2^N (the number of users doubles every N months), so the overall function for the value of a network is O(V^2) = O((2^N)^2) = O(2^(2N)) = O(4^n). O(4^n) > O(2^n), but it is not the same as O(2^(N^2)), which was what Sam was trying to convey.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetration
or this: