Hacker News Reader

Comment by tylermauthe | Hacker News Reader

This is a really cool service, but I have some questions after reading through everything:

- You say it is HTTPS over a persistent TCP connection, does this mean I can make standard HTTP request... Like using xhr from JavaScript?

- Any plans for SDKs or libraries? Example code in popular languages perhaps...

- How is this different from Parse? (Except less developed)

Also, some feedback:

- Make it easier to understand the main benefits quickly, I had to read the small text

- I love the simplicity of the product, keep it simple - The pricing is weird... Not sure what to recommend, but $1.50 just seems weird. Too low?

edit: formatting

View on HN

Thanks for the feedback. This is a great community. I would love to have more examples on the site. I have included a fully functional Java client on the code page, and will be looking at Objective-C/Swift as well as your suggestion for JavaScript. Asynchronous-response-capable and HTTPS is the basic requirement...if the XHR works I will post the examples on the site.

Regarding comparisons, the DropFrog emphasis is ephemeral messaging--the API is all about communication/messaging between the connected clients and when there are no more channel participants, the channel is destroyed. I have also toyed with the idea of adding limited persistent storage capability; will be listening to feedback.

The pricing is rock bottom, but designed to be sustainable with the current feature set.

Ephemeral messaging sounds cool, you should plug that somewhere on your site. Standing out will be good for business.

My initial concern is connection stability issues. What happens if the client's connection drops out for a period of time? Do clients have to explicitly leave the channel?

My team was estimating a story recently which could have used this, but we didn't want to spend the time and effort to build a whole infrastructure for one message. This would have been perfect! If I find some time, I'll give it a try and send you my feedback.

A client TCP connection close, whether intentional or due to network failure, does quickly remove the participant from the channel.

Got it... I'm not sure I understand the use case for this tool then?

In a browser, the TCP connection will close itself. On a mobile device, the TCP connection will close when the network connection drops.

I suppose a server could reliably keep a TCP connection open, but at that point why wouldn't I just deal with the messages myself..?

Mobile device connections work well enough -- a reliable VOIP app on Android was constructed with the DropFrog service on the backend. Generally, a network connection can get dropped on any device even for a "server" device; it is a failure case to anticipate and program accordingly. On DropFrog, by the way, the channel continues to exist if there are any participants and also for half a minute with no participants whatsoever, anticipating and accommodating failure cases. For the browser (and more) consideration, WebSockets under control of the application programmer makes the most sense, fulfilling the requirements of a persistent and secure connection (WSS). WebSocket support will be added in the future.

Awesome! Thanks for the info. Good luck with the product, hope to find some time soon to try it out.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com