Tablet growth rate forecast slashed by half as Western markets slow
zdnet.com
zdnet.com
At that price, I'd risk carrying it with me all the time. With that battery life, it would usually be usable, and with that screen, I would be able to read what I really want to read (journal articles, programming books, textbooks with lots of equations, history books with maps, etc.), unlike the plain-text fare I'm usually limited to with a Kindle eInk device.
I don't know if such a thing could be built yet at that price, but there are tablet niches such as these serious reading devices that haven't been served yet.
Sorry, but that's a crappy argument. Pony up the cost if that device is so important to you.
http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/03/27/sonys-13-3-ereader-...
So...if you are leaving comments here about "I would buy a tablet if..." That's where I was a few months ago, and I think you should just bite the bullet and buy one. They're good enough now.
(and using Pythonista and Codea...brilliant IDE adaptations to the tablet + finger use case)
It's similar to using a phone, but being so much larger really does fundamentally change the experience.
Not only are they good enough, but they are very sturdy (at least the iPads I've owned), they will last "forever". Or at least 3 or 4 years before the battery fails.
No reason that the 2 year upgrade cycle that applies to cellphones should apply to tablets.
There might be an optimum size that is slightly smaller and thinner than the Nexus 7, but I find it hard to imagine using anything that's even slightly larger on a daily basis.
On a side note, what I would buy is a tablet with an HDMI input so I could use it as a portable monitor (field monitors are too bulky and pricey!). Anyone know if such a thing is available?
https://www.adafruit.com/products/1652
It's not a standalone tablet though, just a screen.
Or is it that people are buying devices in cycles that are roughly synchronised?
[1] http://www.computerworld.com/article/2599990/windows-pcs/mac...