Windows Live, Live Calendar, Live Contacts, Live Messenger, Live Photos, Live Mail...
They messed it up with Visual C++ which wasn't visual at all (unless raw Win32/MFC code is someone's idea of beautiful scenery).
By the time is came out, Visual Studio was actually very visual in comparison with their competition.
Also, the integration was tighter, so the experience was supposed to be seamless. YMMV. It wasn't like we grabbed a can of "Live" spraypaint and hit everything we could see.
To me, it sure seemed that way. Went from a perfectly usable, lightweight "MSN Messenger 4.0" client to some slow-as-molasses abomination "Live Messenger".
Microsoft chop and change brands all the time, often in ways that are confusing to the consumer and damaging to the business.
So yes, Apple does reuse monikers in their branding. But they use them to create a branding language that helps them to better communicate with customers. This is starkly different from what Microsoft is trying to do with the Windows brand, which is to turn the word into a blaring, monotonous drone to be blasted at us until we enter some sort of alternate mental dimension where words lose all meaning and every single noun is replaced with the word Windows.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-05-04/swatch-objects-to-a...