CentOS announces second patch for bash security issue CVE-2014-7169 | Hacker News Reader

CentOS announces second patch for bash security issue CVE-2014-7169

lists.centos.org

8 pointsck22 comments

If you don't want to wait for yum mirrors to catch up

http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/updates/x86_64/Packages/ba...

What I find slightly strange is a second patch is not yet available on gnu/bash itself, so this must have been developed in-house by redhat or published elsewhere first.

I guess we could diff the second version with the first.

The new patch "bash-X.X-env-inject2.patch" is actually http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q3/att-690/eol-pushback.pat... which doesn't work in bash-3.2 from CentOS 5:

  $ bash --version
  GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (i686-redhat-linux-gnu)
  Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  $ env -i X='() { (a)=<\' bash -c '/etc/crontab cat'
  bash: X: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `='
  bash: X: line 1: `'
  bash: error importing function definition for `X'
  SHELL=/bin/bash
  PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
  MAILTO=root
  HOME=/

  # run-parts
  01 * * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.hourly
  02 4 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.daily
  22 4 * * 0 root run-parts /etc/cron.weekly
  42 4 1 * * root run-parts /etc/cron.monthly

for reference, thats how other shell behaves:

  busybox$ env -i X='() { (a)=<\' ./busybox hush -c '/etc/crontab cat'
  hush: can't execute '/etc/crontab': Permission denied

Reply on news.ycombinator.com