> they could have certain got a warrant to do so had they just presented what they knew at that time about the enterprise. So why didn't they?
Perhaps they want to set a legal precedent which would require less checks & balances.
Perhaps they want to set a legal precedent which would require less checks & balances.
Not sure what is worse. Democratically passing new bad laws or subverting the constitution via underhanded techniques. I guess the former is depressing and the latter shows mal-intent?
Burn down the Reichstag or get 3/4 majority to nullify the 4th?
I'd argue that it should be a constitutional offense to weaken the constitution using non-constitutional means. Attempting to rewrite the rules of the game during gameplay should get you autobanned by punkbuster.