Should you Walk or Bus?
visualmotive.com
visualmotive.com
For all these reasons, plus the usual carbon footprint and travelcard, I don't take the bus anywhere unless it's more than an hour's walk. (Before I moved to Edinburgh I hated, hated hated hated, walking. Selling one's car does fantastic things to the mindset.)
Still. It's a pretty graph!
I bike or take the bus or train for anything more than a mile. Walking is very boring. (I have never owned a car either.)
BTW, Chicagoans are lucky to have estimated arrival times for every bus stop in the city (http://ctabustracker.com/). It is very accurate and makes deciding between walking and waiting for the bus an easy decision. (Usually I commit to taking the bus and just sit in my apartment until a few minutes before it is scheduled to arrive. It's wonderful.)
Actual average speed depends a lot on the number of passengers. At rush hours, if you're walking at a fast pace you can outrace a bus. Only so much the driver can do when 20-30 people get on the bus at a stop.
The crosstown M23 bus is scheduled to travel the two miles between 11th Avenue and 1st Avenue in 24 minutes.
It takes me 20-30 minutes to make the same trip on the subway, 20-25 minutes by bike, and less than ten minutes if my wife drops me off via car.
Assuming reasonably flat ground, it's not hard to walk a mile in well under 20 minutes. Bicycling around 15 mph ain't too hard, either -- which would get you 1.5 miles in 10 minutes.
buses suck. they are biker killers. i always thought this was a shame since public transportation and self transportation are on the same environmental team. i've had buses seriously try to run me over (turn right even though i'm sitting in the bus lane making eye contat with the bus driver who is yelling at me, honking and not slowing the turn). to say nothing of the accidents that have put my friends in the hospital (bus smoosh).
That's not how humans work.