Hacker News Reader

+1

sadly democracy in India only has the voting part implemented fairly well. It's a monarch until the next election. Even the voting is neck deep in corruption [1]

[1] http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/cash-for-vo...

View on HN

Indian voters are suffering from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

What do you mean its a monarch until next election. Head of state is often elected for the term period. Also it maybe one of the cases reported, it doesn't imply voting is entirely corrupt.

Will the downvoter exercise his freedom of expression to tell me what is wrong with my comment above.

My guess is that he meant "dictatorship" rather than "monarchy". You took umbrage with his mistake rather than forgiving that and recognizing his intent, which is that the PM role in India has way too much power.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com