Not at all what I expected. I was imagining some new explanation for why people some people copy blog posts and present them as their own. That, in my mind, counts as "getting ripped off". But the fact that a writer is not able to generate high advertising revenues--how does that constitute ripping him off?

In any case, I figure that, if intent harvesting is where the money is on the net, then those who want to make lots of money on the net ought to do intent harvesting, rather than complain about how whatever they are doing is not lucrative.

Or am I missing something?