Using Atom 330 with server applications
3.14.by
3.14.by
.. or 24-64 slots on mid-range systems, for that matter?
Because, unless it's serialized (like FBDIMMs), there's a linear growth in number of traces (and something line n^2 growth in board surface area taken up by them) for memory, not to mention a more complex (or at least bigger) memory controller.
I'm sad that fully buffered memory didn't take off, as I'm sure the power consumption problem would, eventually, have been solved.
I don't use ECC RAM in my desktop, and I notice that one a year or so my "every-30-days fsck" detects a filesystem error when I have not uncleanly unmounted the disk. That is either a filesystem bug, or memory corruption.
* With VPS systems you generally have to run one of their kernels, or at least Linux. Very few BSD VPS sites and none allow me to run OpenBSD, which is what I would like.
* The low cost Atom systems give you much more ram and hard disk than the VPS sites for comparable cost. In the $30 range a VPS will give about 512M of ram and 10-20G of hard disk space. Most of the Atom/low cost dedicated hosts are roughly the same cost and give 2-3G of ram and 60-100G of drive space. (I hadn't seen SSD's used before)
Just clarifying.