Stat arb is what happens when you actually do statistics, and these days it's got only a slim to nil advantage.
Stat arb is what happens when you actually do statistics, and these days it's got only a slim to nil advantage.
If technical analysis actually worked, you'd be able to find the "Technical Analysis Toolkit" for on GitHub, and... technical analysis would no longer work. A little bit of grepping around yields: http://ta-lib.org/ (Technical Analysis Lib).
Ergo: if technical analysis ever worked (there is some evidence it did before about 1990 when personal computers became ubiquitous) it almost certainly does not today.
The only way market timing approaches can work is if they embody significant information that is not generally available. A successful market timer has to be smarter than everyone else in the market at the time of each trade.
Anyone claiming technical analysis works is claiming that there is an inefficiency in the market that has been well-documented in public for decades, to the extent that an open-source BSD-licensed tool for identifying the inefficiency exists, and yet the inefficiency still exists.
This is simply contradictory.
I actually think that in this case you are probably right, though. But I wouldn't bet my life on it.
Statistically it would be ok to bet your life on it, though.
Did you hear the one about the economist who drowned crossing a river that was three feet deep on average?