Hacker News Reader

Comment by Flankk | Hacker News Reader

"Clearly advertising to smart people is in demand."

I think the point is that advertising to smart people is not effective; they will research and find the best product regardless of advertising.

View on HN

Whether your notional smart person ultimately chooses a given product or not, based on the results of their research, advertising may still be the thing that makes them aware of the product in the first place.

I think that point is highly focused on the decisions people would self report. I've seen studies where perception of a fictional brand is significantly increased through repeated banner advertising. I'm sure some high IQ participants in the study would report no impact, but have been influenced at a pre-verbal level. The psychology of repeated exposure is well documented.

If you view advertising as subversive and dishonest, then yes, advertising to smart people is less effective.

Not all advertising is dishonest, and instead informative. Hopefully the new media technologies will let this type of advertising thrive.

The main reason I perceive advertising as 'dishonest' is that most of it is talking at the consumer, rather than communicating with. Once more companies figure out how to do this, then smart people will evaluate that advertisement with as much value as a fellow community member's dis/approval. Plus the trust factor comes into play heavily. Leo Laporte has a huge level of trust in the tech community, and we all know he is here because he truly loves what he does and would never compromise his community. (And I specifically chose 'community', not 'audience'.)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com