They certainly do provide speculation and conspiracy theories.
I like looking from different perspectives. I'm OK with somebody having different perspective, but once in a while it's great to take a moment and "hey take a look how it looks from my point of view". Since I clearly have been received negatively, I'd love to learn more about your perspective, so any links providing info on how these allegations are false and how GS is doing mostly good things are welcome.
"I said some things that were true" is very different from "What I said was true."
A case in point is a global car surplus post a few months back, which turned out (on pretty trivial research) to be using photos dating back many years, to the heart of the global financial crisis. It's only one case among many, but comes to mind.
That's not to say that there isn't occasionally some merit to ZH reporting, but you pretty much have to evaluate and assess each individual story on its own merits and based on independent verification.