The Web Is Getting Slower, at Least in How We All Experience It
wired.com
wired.com
This is with Ghostery blocking 23 (!) trackers and ad services. With Ghostery re-enabled, it takes 56 seconds before page load is completed, and over 6MB of stuff has been loaded via 266 HTTP requests.
That's why the web is slowing down. Any questions?
Yeah, I have a question. What's your definition of reasonably fast?
In Romania, on average connection, the Wired page would load during 1 second.[0] That is my definition of reasonably fast.
The monopoly of ISPs is why the web is slowing down.
Oh, and I have another question. Why don't you consider caching of resources that will make every consequent Wired page load much faster?
Not to mention (what I perceive to be) a tremendous increase in bloat on the web. We have designers going overboard with HTML5 canvas gee whiz effects, infinite scroll, everything requiring javascript when it really shouldn't, and pages with actual content on the order of kilobytes being delivered hidden among tens of megabytes of data.
Added to that, the telecom monopolies have little incentive to improve their infrastructure. It's consequently little wonder that "the web is slow"
I was expecting something about all those pop overs with weird close buttons, quizzes greying out content, and content waiting for ad networks before loading.
The WWW is getting incredibly slow, but it's because of publishers trying to invent the next pop up more than anything. All we need now is the next blink tag and we've come full circle.
> This page... 95 external javascript requests, 8 different style sheets (all of which are filled with vestigial gunk accumulated over time), 10 different background images. There's 150 lines of commented-out ASCII graphics in the leader... probably more graphics gunk than content. And the javascript is all at the top, killing page rendering. Web pages have become wastelands full of bloat.
We've gotten so accustomed to having ubiquitous access, people have forgotten it wasn't always there.