The problem and major benefit to github is how easy it is to contribute. Sometimes it's like a high maintenance low paying customer vs. a high paying customer that treats you like a professional and gets out of your way I guess.
The problem and major benefit to github is how easy it is to contribute. Sometimes it's like a high maintenance low paying customer vs. a high paying customer that treats you like a professional and gets out of your way I guess.
Of course we know that Docker, and Rocket, and to an extent more of the AWS tools are automating a lot of these processes, but for every problem they solve, some people can't use them, and we're counting on "script things, run them in a repeatable environment, share the scripts, and results with your team" theme won't go away for a while (ever?), as most of what we do, even with all these modern deployment tools is still programmer duck-tape.
I just wanted to ask your opinion on the docker comment - I think tools that make repeatable builds will always be necessary (even if only to make the first docker instance of your immutable server).
Or is there some other theme at play I so not understand that means this idea is old hat?