> Real risk for real people has been created. It's not theoretical.

Risk of what?

> Actual innocent people have been placed in danger.

Who?

I'm not attempting to argue the point. I haven't read the report. It just seems a strong statement to make that innocent bystanders (with no connection to torture) have been put at risk (of what?).

I'm curious how legitimate this claim is since to be honest it reads a bit like FUD (that's just how it comes off; but I'm just looking for a rationale).