Barf bags on airplanes: Are rates of airsickness declining?
slate.com
slate.com
I remember as a child how the smell of cigarette, coupled with the decrease sense of equilibrium that you can experience in a plane, would easily cause nausea.
Moderated drinking habits probably also play a role: when flying was rarer, and a rougher ride, throwing back excessive drinks before/during/between flights may have been a bigger part of the adventure – then also boosting airsickness rates.
She got violently airsick every single flight and nobody could figure out why. Then when the international flights went non-smoking, the nausea stopped. She's 100% convinced it was the smoke. Even sitting in the "non-smoking area" got a constant wave of second-hand smoke that wafted around.
I rate the primary cause to be cleaner and fresher air, perhaps about 90% of the problem solved. I'd say the last 10% is that airlines are smarter about dealing with turbulence.
However, it can fly more direct routes and do smoother curves.
I remember the last time I felt really bad was in an AA Super-80, doing a lot of curves to reach an airport.
Bigger planes (737s/A320) were not so bad
Any recommendations? I've 'grown out' of most of my motion sickness over the years but boats still get me bad. I can just about make 60 mins without being sick and then I feel awful for the next several hours. I've tried lots of stuff but most of it doesn't seem to help.
"TTS-S has proved to be significantly superior to placebo in reducing the incidence and severity of motion sickness by 60-80%. It was more effective than oral meclizine or cinnarizine, similar to oral scopolamine 0.6 mg or promethazine plus ephedrine, and the same as or superior to dimenhydrinate."
You definitely don't see the bags as much as you used to. I've noticed their absence myself. I suspect it has to do with generally bigger and more stable jets and better routing around turbulence. I do wonder though how much also had to do with the bags being one of the things airlines just stuck in the seatbacks out of long habit going back to the days when there were more props and small jets. Many airlines have cut back on a lot of stuff they used to routinely pass out like blankets and pillows.
I can't imagine the bags are a significant cost to airlines -- everyone's heard of the 'American Airline olive,' but those were actually being consumed every flight. Compare that to the PR from customers smelling vomit for hours because there was no bag.
What i can imagine is that time spend on cleaning a single barf spot probably exceeds the costs of paper bags. Then again, who says everybody managed to put everything neatly in the bags and no cleaning afterwards is required.
Need some proper stats to calculate this i guess.