Hacker News Reader

Comment by DanBC | Hacker News Reader

They get paid less; they don't get to set their pay; but it's somehow their fault that they get paid less?

It's the same for men in fashion. It is just a matter of market value. We are talking about opportunities here, not how valued they are.

You can talk about whatever you want. When I kicked off the thread, it was to point out how the structure of sports in our society puts women in a ghetto, in ways that e.g. the admittedly imperfect tech industry doesn't even approach, and yet sports get a complete pass on this. Even many outspoken feminists settle for Title-IX-style resource-grubbing rather than challenging the basic structure of the ghetto.

Any argument you might make defending the sports status quo would have applied to any sexist cultural institution ever. Case in point: every single sentence in the comment to which this is a response.

I guess we are talking about very different things. I am talking about opportunities in sports, not about the state of the sports industry.

The men's basketball medal counts just the same as the women's in the Olympics. They both had to train and practice the same to get to that point. That's all I care when I think about opportunities.

They get paid less because they work in a much smaller market. Does it also upset you that stage actors make less than AAA movie stars?

People are not blocked from being AAA movie stars on the basis of their gender.

Right, because they have the physical capacity to compete. In the NFL, the NBA, the MLB, etc., they don't. They just plain don't. If that confuses you then go take it out on God or biology.

If that is true why not let women try out for it?

Because at best it's a publicity stunt and wastes the time of all involved? Do you really think that a woman can compete with men on a football field? C'mon. Even the women in these sports laugh at the idea.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com