> ... it's a fundamental part of the Bluetooth spec...
The key word being "part", so the headline is incorrect.
> Without it you couldn't have Bluetooth.
While it was the main innovation in 2.0, EDR was optional in the spec.
The key word being "part", so the headline is incorrect.
> Without it you couldn't have Bluetooth.
While it was the main innovation in 2.0, EDR was optional in the spec.
That's a ridiculous argument. Parsing the spec like that is meaningless.
"While it was the main innovation in 2.0, EDR was optional in the spec."
Can't argue with non-reasoning like that.