> OCaml and Haskell offer very similar functionalities and their compilation times are lightning fast.
It took only one sentence to show that you never used OCaml or Haskell, so I'm not sure how serious the rest of your claims should be taken.
It took only one sentence to show that you never used OCaml or Haskell, so I'm not sure how serious the rest of your claims should be taken.
Yes, but OCaml doesn't "offer very similar functionalities".
Haskell is quite a bit slower if you consider that you often have to compile not only your own code, but also the sources of your dependencies in the beginning. Additionally, you have to fight with Cabal, which tends to be very unpleasant due to the lack of any reasonable support for exotic things like "versions". Then you might discover hacks like "sandboxing". Hours not spent coding.