>Firefox is too slow.
Despite all the evidence to the contrary?
>As a power user I notice millisecond differences in page render times.
No you don't. As a web developer, I personally can attest that's not true.
Despite all the evidence to the contrary?
>As a power user I notice millisecond differences in page render times.
No you don't. As a web developer, I personally can attest that's not true.
It's fast in benchmarks… but it's either single-threaded or has horrible locking. One slow script somewhere will not just block the tab, but the entire browser. Good luck hunting it down with 40+ open tabs.
(I really miss Opera 12, it's still the only browser to decouple the UI to its own thread so a long-running script doesn't lock up the page. Or the whole browser…)
Humans are impatient to the core.
Also, what evidence you have that says Firefox can't be slow(even with all the add-ons it supports). In fact, those hundreds of bugs will be quite a sufficient evidence that it indeed is for many people. (It's coming from someone who still hasn't converted to Chrome)
You might dismiss it as pedantry, but there is a clear linguistic difference between "I notice millisecond differences" and "I notice differences of 300ms".