Hacker News Reader

Comment by arfliw | Hacker News Reader

The two with discussion are certainly relevant. The others were not. To me, they served only to give the false impression that this has been discussed a lot more than it actually has.

> They are not intended to scold people for submitting things that have been submitted before

So I guess that explains why you began with 'oh no, not again'

View on HN

    > The two with discussion are certainly relevant.
    > The others were not. To me, they served only to
    > give the false impression that this has been
    > discussed a lot more than it actually has.

That's why I said how many comment there were - to give the data that there were lots of submissions, not all of which had generated discussions.

    > So I guess that explains why you
    > began with 'oh no, not again'

Yeah, OK, point taken. I guess I've just been around too long and read too much stuff. I went away for a while and have only just started to read again, but I guess I'm still too jaundiced.

I'll go away again. Sorry.

Do you want me to delete the comment? I think there's still time.

No, don't delete the comment. And don't go away!

I didn't realize you quoted the number of replies, I thought HN did that automatically.

>I'll go away again

haha i never said to go away. play it like it feels. i'm biased since you were responding to my submission.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com