The 315-Year-Old Science Experiment
nautil.us
nautil.us
He did have a valid point. For the data to be consistent across a 300+ year data set, he had to use the same method as his predecessors.
However, you could use technology to augment the manual count. They could use the same k-factor adjustment they used to compare multiple human counters, and use the same k-factor adjustment when technology changes.
Any idea how they watched those back then? With the naked eye seems too painful.