Normal keys work great. I don't see the big advantage of techno-keys that outweighs the (almost inevitable) cost of paying so much for a spare.
Normal keys work great. I don't see the big advantage of techno-keys that outweighs the (almost inevitable) cost of paying so much for a spare.
The other thing -- do the key fobs have an on/off switch? If not, you wouldn't be able to have a spare "hidden" under your car somewhere (yes this is insecure anyway, but it works for most people).
Pop out the battery. You don't need the battery to use the hidden spare if you lose your key: there's a physical key hidden inside the fob to unlock the door, then a slot on the dash to stick the whole fob into to start the car. It's there so you can't be stuck unable to start your car when the fob's battery dies.
Also, the dashboard will always tell you if you are inside the car but key is not detected. So even if it miscalculates where the fob is and let you start the engine, that key-not-present light will be on as you drive off.
I think the trade off makes it not worthwhile. If it's optional, I prefer a normal key.
OTOH, There are lots of other cool gadgets that I'd like to see. A car that remembers everyone's seat position and mirrors, that's progress. Manual transmission, normal key, smart seat. That's my niche.
The simple solution: Just go back to pressing a button to unlock and putting the key in the ignition.
If the manufacturer really wants to keep the feature, then they could switch to those keys that flip out like Fiat has and just turn off the near-unlock functionality on the remote when the key is folded in.
This may not be a problem in California, but it is in some parts of the world. Imagine the shadiest neighborhoods you know. Now, imagine that all of the neighborhoods are like that.
Being able to quickly get in and start the engine is convenient, but also important. The last thing you want to do is to fumble with keys. Or drop them while doing it. It is a plot device in some movies, but also real life.
The problem is that many keyless entry systems - and most wireless 'pushbutton' alarm keys haven't actually picked up gadgety improvements. Instead of a digital system and crypto keys, you have extremely rudimentary, frequency-based systems that are trivial to hack.
I would not have predicted this response for such a trivial thing - what's a few seconds more on top of a 20 minute or 2 hour drive? But it made a big difference to me, and I'm guessing many other people enjoy it as well. The downside of paying for a spare isn't very visible, and when it is, it's just a short acute pain, and is washed away in the daily nicety of "keyless" entry.