It's possible he has a mature opinion on the matter which relates to the actual bill. Unlike your opinion, which seems to focus on ad hominem attacks on him, and ad verecundiam appeals to the EFF.

For instance, I am upset with the provision that gives immunity to any corporation that aids in government spying. I am also upset that this bill does not provide any new oversight apparatuses to the NSA, and does not remove any of the linguistic vagueness that created the loopholes they exploit in order to spy presently.

Yet, at the same time, I do not think 'the EFF is down with totalitarianism.' Perhaps it is your dichotomous perspective on support for this bill which is puerile.

Is that a "grown up" enough response to you?