Here's a laundry list of problems with EU:
http://dealingwithcreationisminastronomy.blogspot.ch/p/chall...
(At a cursory glance it looks valid, despite the domain name.)
http://dealingwithcreationisminastronomy.blogspot.ch/p/chall...
(At a cursory glance it looks valid, despite the domain name.)
Anyway, after around 5 to 10 hours of investigative reading on EU, it seems quite worthy to think about/ follow up on.
At the minimum it's become quite apparent that the Astronomical Standard Model has plenty of spots which are expressed as truth, when there are real problems with observation. I'm not even claiming EU is going to better, but staunch supporters do highlight some interesting inconsistencies and seemingly misguided judgements of modern astronomers. That's not to say their own pet theories are bound to be better though.