Hacker News Reader

Experimental is an all or nothing proposition. With a PPA system it should be possible to keep most of your system on stable, and opt into newer versions of software on a case by case basis.

View on HN

Doesn't apt-pinning solve that? Set a pin that never installs from Experimental unless manually specified, or only install that one package from Experimental?

https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental#APT_pinning

Just a note for the uninitiated: when you pin from Stable you just gave up the guarantees that may have been the reason you were on Stable in the first place. This is an area where RTFM is in order:

"WARNING: Use of apt-pinning by a novice user is sure call for major troubles. You must avoid using apt-pinning except when you absolutely need it." https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch02.en....

Well yes, but all the warnings and cautions in that link apply equally to PPAs - the security implications are pretty similar. A novice using PPAs will be in the same boat, though admittedly PPAs are a little easier to use.

Oh I was being a little tangential and pointing out that changing packages on Stable to an extent defeats the purpose of it. I just hope they don't start releasing PPAs that'll help people achieve worst-of-both-worlds systems that combine the outdatedness of Stable and the bugginess of Experimental.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com