https://www.skepticalscience.com/increasing-Antarctic-Southe... http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/201...
There sure is, and that was my point. Did you read what I wrote at the end about confirmation bias? The mad scramble to provide a just-so explanation when something doesn't fit the hypothesis, but when it does then no need for questions. The reduction in Arctic sea ice could only be due to warming, there is no other possible reason right? Let's look at your thought process for example, because it is a classic:
>Yes, and there is quite a lot of science explaining why we are seeing a temporary rise in Antarctic
Why the fuck are you so certain that this is a temporary rise in Antartic sea ice? Stop and think about that for a moment. Why? You and all the models didn't predict it, the article we're commenting on says they can't quite explain it, but you're here to tell me it is temporary. Whereas anything happening at the other pole, well that isn't temporary according to you. No way, that is definitive evidence of the coming apocalypse.
It appears to actually be you who is guilty of confirmation bias, ignoring the forest in a vain search for the one tree that will prove that climate change is a lie, a belief to which you are irrationally wedded.