Gates, Richest Man, Says $40,000 Goes Further These Days
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
Deleted comment
You're right, these luxuries did not exist when your parents were around, but that doesn't mean other luxuries didn't exist or that they had a much easier time making the equivalent of $40,000 go further. It's called spending less than you make, and that is important at any income level, in any decade.
While I agree with the rest of your comment, the inclusion of this bit bothers me.
I agree with the text of it, but the pragmatic role it seems to be serving - in response to "it was easier before" - is to proclaim that it is comparably possible "at any income level, in any decade", which is manifestly false.
These aren't the budget options - the phone would come with an iPhone or Galaxy S6, internet has unlimited data for instance. And this is all with an Australian dollar worth 75% of the USD at the moment, and living in a country which is notoriously expensive. Not quite as bad as the Bay area, but Sydney, Perth and Melbourne are amongst the most expensive cities to live in the world.
The biggest cost nobody here has mentioned yet is that real estate and rental costs have skyrocketed, so people now are paying (after considering inflation) 2 or 3 times or more what people did a generation ago just for the basics of having a home.
First, you don't really need any of those things. There are plenty of ways to exercise without cross fit and a gym. And in-app purchases? Really?
And then you've grossly exaggerated the prices of some of those. I pay $45 a month for unlimited voice, text, and data on an iPhone. And about $50 for 12 Mbps internet access with more or less unlimited downloads.
I'm not going to say it wasn't presumptuous for Bill Gates to say how far $40k will go, but there's not need to exaggerate.