One of them explicitly suggests that God exists and undertakes a non-scientific point of view while the other does not.
One of them explicitly suggests that God exists and undertakes a non-scientific point of view while the other does not.
He just seems to be good at marketing - the "yawn" article seems to be another incarnation of that. I remember all sorts of newspapers picking up the "belief affects the brain" stuff, and yawning makes a good story, too.
And really, as somebody has noted it above: it's very plausible that belief changes our brains, given that most humans throughout our history have had belief. And research in belief is _very_ interesting and might put light on why most of the humans today believe in something.
Normally I would put aside my Grammar Nazi persona, but you make the mistake twice, so I feel compelled to intervene.