Presentation anti-patterns
troyhunt.com
troyhunt.com
It certainly made me a better speaker.
My solution to "The Notifier" is to take advantage of the fact that I can have multiple logins on my Mac. I have a "Presenter" account that has nothing installed, and has read/write access to my Presentations folder on my main account. Then I'm 100% sure I won't get a notification.
It also eliminates other potential computer distractions (other applications running, wallpapers etc) and you can optimise the configuration setup for the presentation process.
If you try and compromise you get slides behind you on stage with too much text, and documents that don't go into enough detail - not enough text per printed (or PDF) page.
I hate that most conferences ask for a slide deck in advance which they will print up for the audience.
I've noticed this happens a lot more with people who use Retina Macbooks. They plug them into a 1080p projector, and for whatever reason the fonts are a pixel high on the projection.
Some stuff I've learned in toastmasters that's not in the article:
- consciously avoid filler words (um, ah sounds)
- maintain eye contact with the audience
- speaking with volume and authority
Of course, being The Statue is allowed, if you happen to be John Carmack, legs planted firmly on the stage like a colossus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gn8m5d74fk8
Don't give up control of the presentation until it is time for questions.
Sometimes people will butt in with questions, and you should answer them quickly and minimally. I've often seen this kind of thing fluster a presenter, and sometimes the presenter will say "okay, is there anything else? any other questions? " as if to invite more interruptions. This is a mistake, you should quickly address the person who interrupted and then get back into your flow without allowing others the chance to also interrupt.
Another one, that maybe only I am bothered by, is don't start every single answer with "That's a good question..."
The reason why it depends is if you're presenting something complex, say A and B and C, and if understanding B requires understanding A, and understanding C requires understanding A and B there is nothing worse than reaching the end of the presentation and the first question is 'What exactly did you mean by A?' and a lot of nodding heads. That means no one got two thirds of your presentation.
I've been teaching presentation skills for about a decade, and I've seen the above scenario plenty of times, mainly in legal presentations, but also in tech and sales presentations.