> ... crash ... horribly wrong ... clear warnings ... catching fire ... vengeance ... violent ... epicentre ... horribly wrong ... drama ... capitulation ... a lot of pain ... crash ... accident ... hammer ... crushing force ... shock ... vigilantes ...
Looks well set up to trigger sentiment analysing trader bots.
Seriously, he's been lots of fun to read since the start of the Clinton administration, but after a while you learn to apply a mental filter. For that matter, much of the British press is way more ... passionate than ours, that's one of its charming qualities. Along with oddities like the tabloid Daily Mail doing a lot of good reporting along with the celebrity articles, often better for US events than US media.
Pardon?
In the example I'm best acquainted with, the 2011 Joplin, Missouri tornado, their early reporting was as good as anyone from the outside. In my personal photo gallery http://www.ancell-ent.com/1715_Rex_Ave_127B_Joplin/images/ the before and after pictures of my apartment complex at the end were grabbed from the Daily Mail. (EDITED from Daily Mirror.)
In general, in events where photos matter they're really good, and their copy, once you filter out the "passion" as I put it above is pretty good, especially since they don't overly try to force things into irrelevant narratives. More straight reporting than US we pretend to be objective "journalism".
I suggest you try them a few times when a "breaking" event happens, e.g. a hostage situation.