Hacker News Reader

Comment by nkozyra | Hacker News Reader

> You call it Alexa, not Echo. The box says Echo, but you will never interact with it as such. Can you imagine Steve Jobs saying: "here's our big feature for iOS 5, it's called Siri, but you'll interact with it by calling it Yoko"?

I think you're looking at this the wrong way.

The product is the iphone, the human-interaction agent is Siri

The product is the echo, the human-interaction agent is Alexa

View on HN

Isn't that kind of an irrelevant distinction if Echo is mainly designed around that one feature/gateway to features?

Have you used an Echo? The product and the human-interaction agent are clearly intended to be the one and the same.

You don't buy an Echo that comes with Alexa; Alexa is the whole point of the Echo.

You could essentially do the same through Siri - in either event, the separation of the entities still makes sense.

I don't personally understand the need to humanize interactive services and apps, but I guess Siri made that appealing.

Because you're communicating with a device that refers to itself in the first person. Anthropomorphization is inevitable. It's not like this is new, either. 2001 comes to mind immediately, but I'm sure there are plenty of examples that predate HAL.

The different names seemed odd to me at first but it's not that big of a deal. I presume Amazon thought about this.

An slways-on, self contained voice controlled speaker is an entirely different experience than Siri.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com