http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014...
Edit: Nolo has a page about the issue: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-do-when-your-nei...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014...
Edit: Nolo has a page about the issue: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-do-when-your-nei...
Moreover, my understanding is that there's a big gap in case-law concerning drone use. It's really a shame that this trigger-happy hick didn't take the drone case to court, as he might have made a meaningful contribution to the U.S. justice system by doing so.
But maybe the trigger-happy family appreciated this fact, and just wanted to make a statement. I certainly don't like the idea of being surveilled. And it's not just cameras. Drones can easily carry compact equipment for LAN hacking[0] or exfiltrating key material.[1] But for those applications, one would need to land the drone in a suitable location.
[0] http://www.securitytube.net/groups?operation=view&groupId=9