> China was able to get a leg up through dirty coal and oil operations, but there are consequences to this.
No different to anywhere else in the world, just that it happened more recently.
No different to anywhere else in the world, just that it happened more recently.
I am honestly curious. I know for example that the US was very dirty in the early 1900s, but we had 100 million people. If China was dirty in the 2000s with 1.3 billion people, it stands to reason that China was more dirty, no?
Postulating that this was a necessary step to industrialization might require some strong evidence.