>somebody to really needs that job.
That somebody would not "really need that job" because they would be guaranteed a basic income no matter what in a real world scenario.
That somebody would not "really need that job" because they would be guaranteed a basic income no matter what in a real world scenario.
So having a small sample set in a big city invalidates part of the experience since the situation is very different from what would really happen if everyone had a guaranteed minimal income.
A koan, of sorts, rough-shod and ill-fitted, yet perfectly shaped for the game.
Since the other person, who's not taking part in the study, wont receive a basic income, the person in the study might feel morally required to give up their job potential job to the person who really needs it, which means the results of the study will be inconclusive.
When you go apply for a job, do you find out who else applied, and decide if any of them "need" the job more than you?