Why does increasing the number of asset classes guarantee a higher overall return? Is there any proof or intuition? Will increasing the number to 10 asset classes guarantee that you will consistently outperform VOO or VTI or VUG?
Why does increasing the number of asset classes guarantee a higher overall return? Is there any proof or intuition? Will increasing the number to 10 asset classes guarantee that you will consistently outperform VOO or VTI or VUG?
For a simplified model, check out Kelly gambling
So with that logic, shouldn't Betterment with its 12 asset classes and 0.15% fees for >$100k invested be more optimal?
Re. this question, it is addressed in the Wealthfront FAQ: https://pages.wealthfront.com/faq/
> What’s to keep me from investing $10,000 with you and then mimicking trades for my $250,000 portfolio at a discount broker?
> Nothing. But that kind of sounds like a pain in the neck when we only charge you an annual advisory fee of 0.25% (on assets over $10,000) to take care of all the trades in your account, as well as the periodic rebalancing and daily tax-loss harvesting. That being said, you are welcome to copy anything we do if you would rather do it yourself.