Curious as to what your intention is by pointing out my investment in years of profit-free GPLv3 development, and that somehow that is tied to the BSD license of the compiler's creator.
Care to elaborate on a better method? I miss Turbo Assembler, which is in part what brought fasm into existence.
"Advertisement" for GPLv3 sources?
I am not ashamed to openly admit my company would love more contract work, consider what I have contributed for free the "world's most expensive curriculum vitae". I'm interested to hear what other open source decision makers have to say about this, but 2 Ton Digital as a Software resource has made me bupkiss.
More the point, when someone wants something that requires a higher-than-average level of skill, we get business. The community as a whole gets to benefit because I keep turning it loose with no strings attached. Isn't that the way it is supposed to work?