You are assuming a lessened desire, why?
There are no perfect options, only trade offs. FB can provide a service, and if people don't use it, fine. But, let them decide.
There are no perfect options, only trade offs. FB can provide a service, and if people don't use it, fine. But, let them decide.
If they were providing full internet, that would be an incredibly charitable, generous, and positive thing. As it stands, it's just another business venture - which is fine, but not great.
This is so far removed from the truth. What about blogs? Academic papers? Journalistic articles? Mailing list threads? Even paper books!
The name "Internet.org" is grossly misleading. "Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past." Willingly giving a service effective control of the present yields dastardly results.