347 karma · joined April 11, 2023
> The guess is: The Wolf of Wall Street Reason: The movie is about the rise and fall of Jordan Belfort, a stockbroker who defrauded investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars, earning him a lot of money in the process. The road emoji may represent the stock market, which is a symbol of the financial industry. Additionally, the wolf emoji can be seen as a reference to the word "wolf" in the title of the movie, while the emoji...
You could be right, but I don't think it's a given that the latter follows the former. The reason that Zerodium values iOS zero-days less than Androids is more likely because the US and European governments that purchase these exploits from Zerodium value iOS less than Android, which itself could be attributed to there simply being more Android phones used by adversarial countries than iOS.
EDIT: There's also a !bang that does the same thing: !ddgr
I'm curious though. How do you plan to make money from this project (premium subscription option, affiliate links for product-focused databases, etc.)? Will it remain free to use?
Regardless, it seems like an interesting project!
I don't have links on-hand (mobile), but the discussions should be easy to find by searching "distrobox" in the issue page of the respective GitHub repos. I also can't speak to the validity of it since I haven't really had problems with either.
> Given the premices on which the Python language was designed (giving access to programming to non-programmers)
A few years ago, I worked in a neuroimaging research lab and taught some basic Python programming to quite a few research assistants with psych degrees. At the time, a scientific computing or intro to programming course wasn't part of the psych curriculum at the university that the lab was. 0-indexed arrays were often a big sticking point. It just didn't mesh with their intuition.
For example, if `len(some_list)` returned 2, they would try to get the last value with `some_list[2]` and then get confused. Or for another example, if they used `for i in range(n)`, they'd be confused when `i` didn't start at 1 and end at n. They eventually caught on and learned further syntax such as `some_list[-1]` for getting the last value in a list. But, it was a bit of a frustrating experience for both them and myself because I only had time to teach them the basics and some google-fu as well as give them some example code. While 0-indexing was a source of a lot of their bugs in the beginning, I learned that the best method for them to get the hang of it was to encourage them to do a lot of print debugging, which was more than adequate for any scripts they'd be writing. They just really needed more feedback from what they wrote and what it actually did to get a better grasp of the idiosyncrasies of programming vs. their intuition.
Side note: The frustration of teaching non-techies Python was nothing compared to teaching them LaTeX. I was luckily able to eventually convince the PI to adopt Overleaf and organizing the text into separate files and using `\include` or `\input` to reduce the headache of collaborative writing as well as move all the internal docs to markdown. The latter became a huge help when we eventually moved to Jupyter notebooks for a lot of our python-related scripts as the team members already became adept enough with markdown. It was also easier to teach everyone how to use pandoc for making pretty PDFs of the internal docs or converting their markdown drafts into LaTeX.
1: https://jblive.wufoo.com/cabinet/af096271-d358-4a25-aedf-e56...
While Chrome included a button to ask users beforehand, they could've just as easily changed the default browser without asking. I'm not saying Google would do that, but maybe they shouldn't have the ability to do so regardless of intention.
It's a rather peculiar bug.
In other words, how was downstream CentOS considered a beta or "a preview of what was coming down the pipe"?
I thought CentOS was downstream of RHEL. Doesn't this describe what CentOS Stream became?