5,536 karma · joined January 11, 2015
You could add an API which is perfect for agents to use. Something that survives the pull request review process.
I think the answer lies in baking the good old fashioned way and ignoring the factories.
This one is for the bucket "Geniuses are made, not born", and kind of supports the thesis that early habits are important.
> The experiment began in 1970 "with a simple premise: that any child has the innate capacity to become a genius in any chosen field, as long as education starts before their third birthday and they begin to specialize at six."
Another point the author misses is the medical trajectory. If you have ever done math under viral fatigue or low blood sugar, you can appreciate that many people probably operate their whole life under what others would consider "brain fog".
So much effort was spend on philosophizing whether a safe enough sandbox would exist. But that was obviously irrelevant as in hindsight it should have been obvious we were never going to use one.
[0] https://youtube.com/shorts/XnnjvIqf4fU?si=MxuPlR3hjxAgjx5_
It's only search engines? And who uses those anymore anyway? Other bots?
It doesn't affect organic traffic, so you are not really putting yourself into a black hole. A lot of website are driven by social media and organic traffic, so they would be just fine with this approach.
In Belgium, this was the system until 2001. The system was overhauled to the regular single police force after the largest protests in the country's history.
What goes wrong is that these 2 are essentially in competition, and ended up actively obstructing each other.
In short, if the US becomes insolvent, the rest of the world will largely ignore what happens in the (at that point) 8th economy in the world, and mostly try to untie their economy from it.
It is quite counterintuitive, but you can hide texts the same size as the original text in imperceptible statistics of a text.
Compared to that feat, hiding a watermark is very easy.
Thanks for sharing this. It's a deep insight for me. I did not understand how the same people that were deeply skeptical about the state, ended up being so quiet when the state's corruption became flagrant and blatant. But this line of thinking makes a lot of sense.
For two, in context of the original article, what matters is "are they working" which the author clarified to "having a job". A person during the weekend has a job, a retired person does not. Again, no confusion.
For three, in the context of minimum guaranteed wage: a person during the weekend is not paid by the government, but by his employer. A retired person is paid his pension by the government. So one can go in the bucket of people that is actually receiving a minimum income already, the other one does not. So within the context of my first post, they also don't look the same.
If there is a parallel you are seeing and I'm missing, feel free to point it out. What I agree with is that from the person's perspective, they are both not working (in a sense not meant by the OP) and both receiving an income (though from a different source). But after that all similarity stops as far as I can tell.
I'm not sure what you're aiming at with this question.
"Wage to live on" is perhaps a more euphonic translation then.
Do note that in the US (and loads of countries) people save for their own retirement, whereas in Belgium the government pays the retirement in a "workers today pay retirees today" system.
> In Belgium, roughly 4.35 million adults (aged 18 and older) are not working out of an adult population of about 9.5 million, around 45%.
Of those, roughly 3.95 million or 40% receive government income above the leefloon.
Belgium, the Netherlands and a lot of European countries, have a "leefloon" or "bijstand". It is a monthly payment from the government if you have no other sources of income or wealth. The name means it is "pay to stay alive". It's not a lot (1518.29 dollars today for a single person), but allows for the necessities.
So what happens is not _really_ unknown.
So, there is neither something wrong with you, nor with everyone else.
After all, in Europe these butterflies are commonplace, but I've never seen the American bird in my life.
The timing of this by-election is also such that, were there an actual race, Farage would likely get his propaganda on the front of the newspapers throughout the summer months while everyone else in politics is on holiday.
A reasonable comparison would be to look at "Ethnic European", covering roughly 1.2 billion people.
> london's trust level and prosperity have become a shadow of their former selves
As someone who traveled the world a bit and lived for a decade in London, I'd beg to differ without further elaboration.
- Singapore pre-1965 was a low trust, racist society. The tensions were so bad that in 1964 there were racial riots.
- Today, after a lot of immigration, within 1-2 generations, Singapore became a high-trust society.
Similar stories in South Korea and Taiwan. In all 3 cases, the trust came recently, within 1-2 generations, and from different approaches of the state. They combine high institutional trust and the economic prosperity with medium-low interpersonal trust.
But yes, these are averages between 1 person having 12 weeks and 12 people with 1 week. It's most likely power law distributed, so the average will feel weird.
There are people with cancer, severe car crashes and other horrible but temporary medical conditions in this average.
I agree with OP. I don't always carry it along, but it has been a massive boost to my productivity.
Source: I live there
That's why we do appreciate the nth artist making classical or techno music.
And so if the datastream has been produced by something intelligent, the resulting model is indistinguishable from that intelligence. That is the whole compression idea behind artificial intelligence.
The limit is not a bug, it's a feature!