709 karma · joined April 2, 2024
That’s fine. It’s okay for humans to choose to live their one and only life in a way that doesn’t directly benefit “the economy.”
But, I suspect something else is going on here. Perhaps the rights holders strong-arming.
That a law against such a practice does or does not exist today is rather besides the point.
[1]https://web.archive.org/web/20230811081008/https://www.lexol...
[0]https://folkartmuseum.libraryhost.com/repositories/2/resourc...
>’For middle- to high-income, low-fertility countries, falling below replacement level could mean labor shortages and pressure on health care systems, nationalized health insurance, and social security programs. Meanwhile, low-income countries that still have high fertility are at heightened risk of falling further behind on the world’s economic stage, Ezeh says. “They will not be able to make the necessary investments to improve health, well-being, and education” with too few resources to support a booming population.’
That sounds pretty bad.