2,234 karma · joined August 14, 2018
I'm interested in seeing where the proposal goes. I'm not sure where I stand on the issue but I'm curious of others opinions.
Most networks like Flight Aware allow owners to blacklist aircraft such that their tracks do not appear on the site. This is typical of corporate aviation departments and private jet owners as they don't want their movements to be available to rivals/hedge funds or the media. Additionally military aircraft are typically not reported.
Edit: also, for those who are unaware, unlike license plates which are generally unsearchable, tail-numbers as reported by ADS-B are publicly searchable with registration and history information available on the FAA website:
https://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?N...
Cow excrement is absolutely not just fermented grass. It contains pathogens that can be harmful to humans and end up in drinking water. Cows have existed in this area for less than 200 years, out of the millions of years the biome has existed. It's absolutely an emotional issue if you don't understand how ecosystems work.
I'd rather not give out too many personal details of my living situation but it's safe to say my little car doesn't get much use at all.
This seems to be mostly just an emotional appeal rather than a practical one.
Also, we should totally get rid of the refinery too, I'm all for equal opportunity environmentalism.
Even if the wolves do venture out into the plains, it would be much appreciated because my office currently smells like cow shit given that there's a north-easterly wind and Greeley is in that direction with it's horrendous feed lots.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_of_useful_consciousness
In all seriousness though, the printed circuit board might be a good one to bundle with that. The old methods of creating a mechanically robust compact electrical package were nowhere near as efficient. They're also very recent and very easy to make yourself, even if it's thin plywood with tinfoil glued on.
The airplane is a big one and I'm building one myself in my garage, as did the inventors of the first airplane. Hell, a solid chunk of all other inventions were created in someones garage. Compared to a full scale airplane, making nuclear reactors or transistors yourself is even easier and the transistor is easily the single biggest invention of the past century.
The issue is that large aircraft require an aircraft model specific training program called a type rating which is rather involved and expensive. Both Boeing and Airbus have common type ratings across multiple aircraft models and sub-models to save on training costs for airlines. To do this, they need to maintain a high degree of controls and systems commonality between the types and in this case, they fudged these limitations by adding a system which was a significant departure from the older 737 type and type rating training programs without requiring additional training on the MAX sub-model.
The 1500 hour rule was initially instated by the FAA. CASA followed suit but EASA did not for co pilots.
I think what we're seeing is the same principles that worked on the mid century manufacturing laborers being refined for the information economy age.
The RF emitted by cell phones and even 5G systems is many orders of magnitude lower energy than the light you're exposed to all day. The only connection we know of at the moment would be through RF heating but that requires way more radiated power than anything you will likely interact with unless you stick your head in a microwave oven.
Edit: also, things RF can interact with are dependent on feature size. 5GHz has a wavelength of ~6cm so in the same way that you can't see a virus with a microscope because it's too small for light to interact with, it's just not going to be able to cause localized heating on anything smaller than about 3cm. The singular scientist in the article is mostly just taking issue with the testing methodology and wants software to minimize RF emissions to the lowest level possible for communication which is already the case as otherwise your battery would be depleted very rapidly.
Looking back at the past half century the big variables that have changed to get us here seem to be A) lack of world wars to devastate Europe B) rising automation leading to skyrocketing worker productivity C) society's wealth becoming increasingly concentrated within a billionaire class and D) relatively flat wage growth to spite B. There are also probably a few other's I'm missing too.
TLDR seems like there's a bigger picture to the macroeconomic situation than just spending and saving at the moment. I'm really curious to see how this will shake out going forward.
If we didn't build any and decided we wanted massive air travel now? Yep.
If we are only talking about travel between class B airports (basically any major city: LAX, DEN, ORD...)? Not really? DEN for instance was rebuilt in a new location around 1995.
What about literally all airports? Yes, but not really because of this era. We built tons of airports all over the country during WWII and the early cold war for military purposes. The FAA gave out tons of money to municipalities to build airports in places we'd never have them today, see KSMO[1]. Between this and funding from the federal government to subsidize routes serving far flung communities, we're seeing a lot of air travel that wouldn't exist otherwise. This isn't necessarily a bad thing though as it allows these smaller communities to remain connected and support larger businesses. If this situation didn't exist it would put yet more pressure on massive landlocked urban centers to support everyone converging on them and make them the only locales that could support major businesses.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Monica_Airport#Future
Because they would be legally obligated to when using OSM as a base for anything.
Also, because it would benefit society.