2,302 karma · joined June 18, 2016
And it's submission on HN three weeks ago for further discussion on it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27874794
In actuality I do believe there should be a "fair" way for EVs (which I think this tax is probably targeting, as they currently do not pay gas taxes which are supposed to aid in roadway repair) to pay "their share" of roadway maintenance burden. Gas sales tax happened to work out quite neatly because it was a) proportional to the amount of use of the vehicle(s) and b) encouraged further and further efficient vehicle use, but there's no 1:1 parity for EVs.
Personally I wouldn't object to some level of vendor integration where the car itself reported its mileage on a yearly basis for tax purposes and then was billed as part of your yearly registration fee.
Google Cloud Platform has MASSIVE markups compared to equivalent service providers, either from "the big three" or smaller service operators. These smaller service operators have far less margin to work with, yet manage to not only break even but to turn a profit! Either GCP has some product that is a metaphorical black hole consuming all of their excess revenue, or Google generally is spending far too much money doing the same thing that everyone else is doing.
One of the things I've noticed GCP prides themselves on is uptime, and I'm wondering whether they're doing something like _doubling_ their costs to have seven nines of uptime for the entire platform, which practically doesn't matter for anyone other than a handful of clients (healthcare, government, military, etc)
Any other purchase reason is likely to result in ARIN pulling your "ownership" entirely when they discover it.
From what I understand most of what's being sold off right now on ipv4 auctions are from companies who had too much IPV4 that they no longer need, or companies that were liquidated.
Last I checked, AWS wanted ~$200k per MONTH, for just bandwidth (no compute, memory, storage, or anything else). We'd love to be able to use the cloud, but not at the cost of increasing our monthly expenses by an entire order of magnitude, so we just stick to bare metal colocation.
I honestly believe that if you have the technical skill in-house, and are spending more than, say, $30k/mo on public cloud hosting, that you should seriously evaluate whether bare metal could significantly decrease your costs.
Edit: Youtube stream is properly live now. 12 minutes of "dead air".
The more interesting datapoint to me is the hour-by-hour breakdowns of HTTP vs HTTPS, likely due to particular countries that discourage (and have ISPs that block) encrypted traffic.