4,657 karma · joined January 22, 2011
Thinking about this problem and extending the average company life seem like worthwhile endeavors while we're trapped on this ball of mud.
It's a shame open source hardware isn't a thing in this area, but we've been here before. (Buying locked down devices and installing alt OSes.)
I even briefly considered using ffmpeg and bash to get the edits I wanted...
Blender has a complicated UI but at least it feels completely consistent and thought-through. And also like it wasn't designed 20 years ago. I just have more confidence using Blender than others because it's so big, respected and known.
My learning process is basically "How do I do this thing I did in Premiere?" and basic Googling/YouTubing. I needed a tutorial video to get started but otherwise if you know NLEs it shouldn't be too hard.
I couldn't get Resolve to run on my discrete-GPU-less PC running Fedora. First the lack of RPM or Flatpak were lame, but integrated graphics was the real killer.
I started learning Blender VSE and walked away super impressed. Finally found my editor. (Spent years getting used to Premiere on Mac and PC.) It runs good even though I don't have a dedicated GPU yet, unlike Resolve. (And Blender is a full-on 3D modeller, I should note.)
I'm going to scale up my hardware eventually, but right now my editing needs aren't huge. Just chopping and splicing up stuff for YouTube. Blender's VSE is incredibly good for my use case.
Still doesn't make it OK, though.
Will this always be true? There will never be an event horizon/point of diminishing returns where something not-bleeding-edge is "good enough" for 51%+ of users?
I'm grasping at very few straws here...
Not sure you can have one without the other.
Jesus, that's both horrible and seems within reach.
Looking at you, DaVinci Resolve.
I'm not sure how AppImage beats Flathub, it's gotten so damn good.
On the old internet, "know one knows that you're a dog."
On the new internet, "know one knows (for sure) that you're an AI."
In a mixed discussion consisting of both AI and human participants, AI could generate interesting discussions and recite novel-sounding statements for ongoing ones. It doesn't sound plausible to me that an avalanche of profit-driven LLMs would even post -- I would think they'd be the lurkers. My take would be that LLMs actively participating, depending on the content they post, are also labors of love by some nerd out there trying to make the best LLM.
Drain all the profit motives and rent-seeking from the web, and even something like AI joining discussions doesn't sound scary.
We don't know if this is Material 4.0, just Google's proprietary design, or really anything.
It could be 15 years before Google's AI strategy fully stabilizes, but there is precedent.
Early tech finds footing in porn (VHS, internet video, etc.) but that's a separate topic/conversation.
I'm sure Google Pics has a long, fulfilling life ahead of it.
By the time I got to the middle of the article: three massive banner ads (top, right, and bottom) were taking up more content than the text, there was an auto-playing video ad floating in the bottom right corner (overlapping most of one of the banner ads), and a "dynamic" ad in the middle of the text randomly started expanding/shrinking and glitching out making it impossible to actually read anything.
And this is one of the better experiences reading modern blog-alikes. Things are almost at sketchy porn-site levels.
Sad and pathetic...