453 karma · joined March 11, 2011
This is an extremely controversial figure within the pharmacoeconomic literature.
It comes from a publication by the Tufts centre for drug development, who are heavily pharma-funded, and it is repeated verbatim by those with vested interests in the pharma industry.
More on this here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/11/18/does-...
1) wants to leak them (most of the Chinese people who I've met in China, especially those who work in a government or military capacity, will bend over backwards to defend China from any level of perceived foreign criticism)
2) has the capability to leak them (most Chinese people are unlikely to know much about Wikileaks)
I think there may be some argument for legalisation but with medically-supervised consumption in pharmacies or specialised clinics.
Overdoses could (excepting human error) be removed entirely with improved dosage calculations from experienced healthcare staff.
There's some really cool stuff happening in this field. IIRC some farming designs have been open sourced, too.
All you really need is a few hundred metres of rope and some seed spools.
If there is any eastward leakage of Google's code, it's certainly not obvious in day-to-day usage of Baidu's search engine.
It's a very, VERY controversial figure in the pharmacoeconomic literature, but has been accepted as gospel due to continuous repetition in shitty reporting.
Fairly good article discussing this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/11/18/does-...
Actually, the laptops I tried out were almost all Dell + Lenovo (I wanted a thinkpad or XPS). I think, as another commenter said, they were probably Linux + FreeDOS systems originally. What the store owners would do is use Norton Ghost to put whatever (illegal) OS I wanted on there.
I think maybe there are large regional differences in product availability or regulation. I know it was a lot harder to buy iPhones in certain tier 1 Chinese cities than others when I was there, for example.
What the store owners would do is use Norton Ghost to put whatever (illegal) OS I wanted on there.
I have no idea where you were/are in China, but it was impossible to buy a genuine copy of Windows or a computer with it installed when I was in Guangzhou.
For the record, I was visiting Gangding in Guangzhou (the computer District) several times between 2012-14. Every vendor I found was baffled by my request and didn't know why I would ever want this.
I bought my laptop in 2014 in Hong Kong after my UK-bought one died.
I lived in China (Guangzhou) for several years, and it was literally impossible to buy a computer with a legal copy of windows installed on it (or, failing that, a standalone windows disc) in the main computer district of the city.
I eventually had to hop the border to Hong Kong when I wanted to buy a laptop.
The lobbyist who devised the value proposition to Cameron's government must be very proud of him/herself.
The only reason the public clamours for these drugs is because opportunity cost of treatment is very hard to distill into a newspaper headline.
The cancer drugs fund, at base principles, implies that cancer patients lives are more valuable than the rest of the public.
It allows for all sorts of pun titles for academic papers like the following:
[i] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1734179/pdf/v03...
[ii] http://www.nature.com/bdj/journal/v215/n5/full/sj.bdj.2013.8...
It's one of the things that we Brits should be extremely proud of (although pharma-sponsored sob story campaigns in tabloid newspapers may suggest otherwise).
All new technologies are investigated in terms of incremental quality of life gain (vs current treatment norms) and changes in costs.
Furthermore, they consider everything in a wider context of opportunity cost of adopting a new treatment and budget constraints.
For a lot more detail, have a look at the NICE reference case here: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/the-reference-c...
It's useful, but still not really substantial in terms of what generally-applicable knowledge gains he made from specific languages.
He's absolutely bang on that when a bullshitter hits a performance-based situation they're screwed (I'm an early career academic in exactly this situation, it sucks).
S-Ws who don't want to change may well be criticising the article, but there are hopefully some other self-aware ones too!
Here's hoping I can actually find the motivation to read it and then apply the lessons!