I upgraded hundreds of projects. The docs with breaking changes are by version. For smaller solutions you can create a new solution and pull in the code and try to fix everything that breaks. There is also an upgrade tool that can work for smaller projects. But the fastest way for normal sized solutions is to update version by version up to the closest LTS. Then you can go LTS to LTS. .NET does also not only break in code, it breaks in behavior so you really want to test those changes in isolation.
Bs, basically, the docs about upgrading between frameworks and what works with what is actually pretty current and often disappears after some years. Especially anything about edge cases. Several upgrades also demands that you do the upgrade version by version. It is tedious work if you don't have a full understanding of the app. Nuget has also become a complete dependency hell. Today you often have to point out what to use to get your legacy apps to build with newer .NET versions. You can't just go with latest.
Pulling the source and compiling the package instead of pulling the package. Not much difference. Maybe slower build times but more secure and better builds.
I think it would be ok if it was not for the fact that Google will most likely abuse it for other purposes like locking out indie developers even more.
It was the company that I found that was impacted and could have caused it. They also don't play nice with others. It's even in the documentation. We looked into buying their services. They have also caused load problems in other clouds. But it was just a guess. Could be anything.
Braze is my guess. They let customers do a lot of stuff with pushing and pulling data per user and I would guess every customer is in a sandbox. They were also impacted by the incident.
I once described this "debugging" problem to one of the creators and he did not even understand the problem. It is so amateurish you wonder if they ever dipped a toe outside the academic world.
Btw, AI sucks on GO. One would have guessed that such a simple lang would suit ChatGPT. Turns out ChatGPT is much better at Java, C#, Pyhton and many other langs than GO.
Most likely some "antivirus" bs. Probably harmless. Fun fact. Most browsers allow by default GET access to web resources on localhost and LAN. Been used for exploits since last century.
I voted for the only candidate that was clearly against this. However, the companies are suppose to do the scanning, not the police. Corporations like Meta already does things like this for sure. The difference is that they now will have to share potential crimes with the police. For Signal it is worse since it can't be added.
I typically design solutions to minimize the cognitive load on coders boarding my projects. They should not need a mental model to add features. Same with AI.
They aggregate data and use it to hurt people. They use Facebook data for instance. If they collected the data or a "customer" did it does not really matter to me at least.
GPT5 API uses more tokens for answers of the same quality as previous versions. Fell into that trap myself. I use both Claude and OpenAI right now. Will probably drop OpenAI since they are obviously not to be trusted considering the way they do changes.
Don't know about the numbers but is this not the cloud all over again. Promises about cheap storage and you don't maintain it developed into maintenance hell and storage costs steadily rising instead of dropping.
Mid management have always been the same. Idiots. Like at the very first corp I worked at, we got a drag and drop UI tool and the manager was like. We can add that feature in no time, just drag and drop a button.
Either they want the data so bad or they vibed the legal requirements. When I pay online in my country I have to identify myself with a digital id that is legally valid for a lot things. Anything from bank and stock transactions to tax declaration and even accessing medical records.
Wrote a ? cause this garbage forum ghosts any critical poster about any of the HN kids. And no, I will not send a scan of my ass or my face to these shady fkrs.
This is the message you get when calling the same API endpoints as with 4.1. And in the vid they said that the older versions will be deprecated.
Your organization must be verified to use the model `gpt-5`. Please go to: https://platform.openai.com/settings/organization/general and click on Verify Organization. If you just verified, it can take up to 15 minutes for access to propagate.
And when you click that link the "service" they use is withpersona. So it is a complete shit show.
Yep, and I asked ChatGPT about it and it straight up lied and said it was mandatory in EU. I will never upload a selfie to OpenAI. That is like handing over the kids to one of those hangover teenagers watching the ball pit at the local mall.
I switched immediately because of pricing, input token heavy load, but it doesn't even work. For some reason they completely broke the already amateurish API.
"Your organization must be verified to use the model `gpt-5`. Please go to: https://platform.openai.com/settings/organization/general and click on Verify Organization. If you just verified, it can take up to 15 minutes for access to propagate."
And every way I click through this I end in an infinity loop on the site...