BarryMilo

Of all the packaging systems to do this with, npm is certainly one of them.

I recently witnessed one such potential fuckup. The AI had written functioning code, except one of the business rules was misinterpreted. It would have broken in a few months time and caused a massive outage. I imagine many such time bombs are being deployed in many companies as we speak.

So UBI + universal healthcare? Sign me up!

As it was foretold since the beginning, IA use is breaking security wantonly.

You might say the problem CloudFlare is causing is lesser than the ones it's solving, but you can't say they're not causing a new, separate problem.

That they're trying counts for brownie points, it's not an excuse to be satisfied with something that still bothers a lot of people. Do better, CloudFlare.

This is pretty interesting to me, as I do use Grafana in my current role. But none of their other products, and not their helm chart (we're on the Bitnami chart if that's a thing).

So far it's pretty good. We're at least one major version behind, but hey everything still works.

I cannot imagine other products support as many data sources (though I'm starting to think they all suck, I just dump what I can in InfluxDB).

The room is not doing anything of the sort.

Do you believe the same thing about psychiatrists? How are we to deal with mental illness?

Psychologists are a myth?

Isn't the whole problem that it's nigh-impossible to isolate context from input?

The "vibe coding" in the title is almost invisible for me on mobile (Firefox). I immediately thought "yeah, that tracks". I'm not saying this is fair but I think the first order of business for any such initiative should be to differentiate "vibe coding" and "bad coding", as they are pretty inextricably linked in my mind (and I dare say most devs' minds).

+17 human+friendly, I guess I don't care what computers think lol.

That was well-written, though the analogy is immediately obvious but that's on purpose. Is it then a parody of allegory? Pretty entertaining all the same.

I've thought about this problem, though I'm currently employed I'm sending resumes (sparingly). I wonder if the cover letters I send get mistaken for AI; though I doubt it I have no way to know. More likely, they don't get through the deluge of fakes. Even my CV might not, it's impressive in my mind but an AI might write numbers bigger than mine. At least my LinkedIn is old.

This all sucks, I can't wait for regulations (but I'm not holding my breath).

Time to make your apartment a faraday cage!

Mostly just sounds like everyone has depression.

My god the amount of projection in your comment. It seems you've mistaken me for everyone who ever commented in favor of migrating off of Excel.

I"m aware that there are things I'm unaware of. Perhaps I don't know how to use Excel, I'm "no true Excel user" if you will, and therefore my opinion is invalid. Like you I'm baffled not by the technical side of things but by our reaction to it. People say "it powers 10% of the world's economy" but not "and it's a problem".

It's a problem. My point is not that LO is better, it's that we should work to remove our dependency on closed-source software for universal office work. Governments should be doing that. But no, let's just say "the other one sucks" and continue to act like depending on a single for-profit company for all our economies is a good thing.

Not sure how my other comment relates to this. Is it arrogant to have preferences?

It's crazy to me how because 1% of Excel users need pivot tables or something we're all stuck on it. LibreOffice is enough for the vast majority of use cases.

As much as I'm a diehard Linux defender, Gnome can get bent. XFCE does everything I want, which is to say, almost nothing.

We use to just call those honeypot fields. Works like a charm.

Canadian here: I don't know how anyone can be surprised.

Why would we need jobs at that point?

And internal threats, well, you just have to deal with those, no matter the cost!

What do you mean by "next"? Evolution doesn't have a plan. It'd be more adapted for some things and less for others.

Reminds me of that AI company that didn't want it's applicants too use AI in the process. Like... you made this monster.

Is that bad? The Culture is pretty cool I think. I doubt the real thing would be so similar to us but who knows.

Do you not see the contradiction in what you're saying? "LLMs will replace us all... I can't find a use for LLMs".

Get to replacing us already. It's a gold rush, someone needs to get rich selling shovels.

Yeah kinda seems like this guy would be better off pivoting to landscaping or baking or something. Maybe construction, there's always work in construction. Pays well too!

If "resembling" intelligence was enough, all programmers would've been replaced long ago.

I've said this on here before, but replacing programmers means replacing our entire economy. Programming is, by and large, information processing. Guess how many business's services can be summed up as "information processing"? I'd wager most of them.

So maybe you're fucked, yes, but if so, we all are. Maybe we'll just have to find something to do other than exchange labor for sustenance...

You might be right, I should give it another go

I've been part of a few (Canadian) cooperatives. The incentive structure is completely different, it's akin to admitting you prefer great working conditions than having a chance to chance it rich. If a company is startup-sized, anything else is a sucker's bet.