BiosElement

uBlock seems to work just fine, not sure why you're claiming they removed it.

Easy, population control. Specifically with wolves and other hunting/pack animals, but really any imbalances can lead to major problems. Get enough of them and they'll consume the local wildlife and either starve or start looking for food in cities. Even animals that are fairly harmless such as Deer can be a threat though through wondering into roads.

While I'm no fan of 'sport' hunting, it does serve a purpose since we've already removed most of the big threats these animals would naturally face.

Your web devs must suck then dude. I don't know a single web dev who doesn't go out of their way to provide the best range of browser support possible.

In other words, you're talking about something totally different then this entire topic and are in reality, the actual troll.

Incorrect. He blames the car, not the charger stations. If he wanted to review the stations, he wrong the wrong article.

Because it's nearly impossible to prove a negative.

I suggest you learn the situation before making ignorant, unfounded comments.

Since when is PCWorld's opinion worth anything?

Does everyone who competes with Google have to resort to personal attacks and pathetic complaints?

Honestly my only complaint would be that Google as a company needs a human face. And when I say that, it's important to note that it took me a couple minutes to think of it.

People frequently dislike change, and so I'm pleased that a major company such as Google has the will to change and improve it's services. But they not only improve their services, which is good for their bottom line, but also releases a lot of their work and research which helps others.

That's really a shame. One issue with google is they still don't quite know how to do good customer service.

I never said they can break the law, however I don't believe they do. I totally agree you should appeal if you think they're wrong and maybe their systems for doing so suck. By all means call them on that, but I think everyone should be careful not to confuse ignorance with intent.

Why? There's no reason Google can't run their services as they see fit. If I don't want you to use my service, that's my choice. There's nothing illegal about it.

Quite frankly I don't buy it. Sounds to me like he wanted to play the legal games and during that time Google just happened to review it.

You mean besides a whole crapton of 1 penny apps? That was one hell of a discount if you ask me.

Complain to google, it's not possible currently.

This nonsense gets voted up? Why cater to Google bashers, because that's all the author is doing.

That's nonsense though. Facebook shows up in search results too. I see where you're going with that, but it's invalid.

Tell that to the MPAA then next time they claim piracy is hurting their business. :)

And were clearly not as well prepared as the TPB crew.

You mean besides the MPAA/RIAA bribes?

Let's not and say we didn't.

This isn't exactly news, they're still liars.

So it's not only a guess, but you imply patchers are not coders. That's just cheap.

And you'd be a very silly person to make that bet, as you'd lose a lot of money.

Don't forget the tinfoil hat.

Go back to Reddit, you clearly belong there. :)

Yes, yes you could. But good luck getting at paypal. The law doesn't apply to them.

He should care because if he did that I'd take his sorry ass to court for destruction of MY property.

And I predict everyone on this planet will die at some point in time!

... ...

I guess that means I was right all along!